The Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999 (Cth) (‘EPBC Act’) environment impact assessment process applies to actions that have a significant impact on a matter of national environmental significance.
The EPBC Act does not define “significant”. Although “impact” is defined in section 527E of the EPBC Act does define “impact” to include:
The Minister for the Environment Protection, Heritage and the Arts (“the Minister”) has issued Administrative Guidelines For Determining Whether An Action Has, Will Have, Or Is Likely To Have A Significant Impact On A Matter Of National Environmental Significance Under the EPBC Act 1999 (“the Guidelines”).
The Guidelines set out criteria by which to assess the impact a development may have on each matter of national environmental significance under the EPBC Act. The Guidelines state that in order to decide whether an action is “likely to have a significant impact”, it is necessary to take into account the nature and magnitude of potential impacts.
“Significant” - In determining the nature and magnitude of an action's impact, it is important to consider matters such as:
“Likely” - is described in the Guidelines as:
The Minister must take into account the Precautionary Principle in deciding whether an action is likely to have a significant impact on a matter of national environmental significance.
The EPBC Act definition of the “Precautionary Principle” is that lack of full scientific certainty is not a valid reason for refusing to prevent degradation of the environment where there are threats of serious or irreversible environmental damage; (section 391 of the EPBC Act).